Pages

Sunday, December 21, 2014

HOPES, GOALS, AND THANK YOU




HOPE:  My hope is that my work with anti-bias education creates a future citizens that will respect, celebrate, and fight for the equity of others.

GOAL:  My goal for the field would and for myself would be to help further the anti-bias pedagogy into the elementary early childhood years grades K-3.  This work is so vital when children truly start making friendships and either including or excluding other children based on similarities and differences.

THANK YOU to all my friends, family, and colleagues for supporting my personal and professional growth in the area of anti-bias education.  Thank you for listening to my thoughts, ideas, insights, and questions while I am working out my path along this journey of self-awareness and discovery!


Saturday, December 13, 2014

START SEEING DIVERSITY

"The heart of anti-bias work is a vision of a world in which all children are able to blossom, and each child's particular abilities and gifts are able to flourish."
-Derman-Sparks & Edwards, 2012







Giving children the words to express their feelings about the world they see around them and investigate the injustices of bias and prejudice helps to accomplish the following core goals of anti-bias education:

ABE Goal 1
Each child will demonstrate self-awareness, confidence, family pride, and positive social identities.

ABE Goal 2
Each child will express comfort and joy with human diversity; accurate language for human differences; and deep, caring human connections.

ABE Goal 3
Each child will increasingly recognize unfairness, have language to describe unfairness, and understand that unfairness hurts.

ABE Goal 4
Each child will demonstrate empowerment and the skills to act, with others or alone, against prejudice and/or discriminatory actions.

Reference
Derman-Sparks, L., & Olsen Edwards, J. (2012). Anti-bias education for young children and ourselves. Washington, DC: NAEYC.

Saturday, December 6, 2014

WE DON"T SAY THOSE WORDS!


I was waiting in line at the grocery store when a small child asked their mother why another customer was fat.  The mother, probably embarrassed, silenced and scolded the child by whispering "shhh we don't call people fat."  Although it was not wrong to correct the child on their language (using "fat") the scolding sent the message to the child that there was something wrong with the size of that other person because it is something forbidden to talk about.  If the mother would have continued to explain in a calm and normal voice that people come in all shapes and sizes then the child would have learned the language to correctly talk about people of different weights.

When our children point out differences in others they are not necessarily putting a judgment on what they see, they are merely trying to make sense of the world and the people in it (Derman-Sparks & Edwards, 2012).  However, because of our own schema and bias we often see those differences as something that people are ashamed of and would not want to have people talk about.  So when our children say something about those differences aloud it is embarrassing and we quickly try to silence them or avoid real answers.  This misleads children into thinking that there is something wrong with those differences.  Derman-Sparks and Edwards (2012) explain that "to understand the differences they see around them, children need language and accurate information" (p. 33).

As anti bias educators we must be ready to respond to children's curiosity in a way that is factual and developmentally appropriate.  To do this we must willing to:
  • Listen without judgement.
  • Figure out exactly what the child wants to know so that we do not give too much information or over explain.
  • Distinguish between curiosity and discomfort or fear.
  • Answer matter-of-factly.
  • Always respond, even if you have to tell them you need time to think about what to say.
  • Finally, follow up with individual children or group (Derman-Sparks & Edwards, 2012, p.33).
Reference
Derman-Sparks, L., & Olsen Edwards, J. (2012). Anti-bias education for young children and ourselves. Washington, DC: NAEYC.

Saturday, November 15, 2014

WHY DO YOU THINK THAT?

Gender, Gender Identity, and Sexual Orientation

  • Some of the ways you noticed that homophobia and heterosexism permeate the world of young children including books, movies, toys, stores, culture of early childhood centers, and schools
With Christmas approaching I have wondered into the toy aisles at the store and I have been more aware than usual at the covert and overt messages that toy companies are sending to our children.  The pink and colorful aisles are filled with babies, Barbies, play kitchens and food, and stuffed animals.  The dark aisles are filled with cars, weapons, and action figures.  We encourage girls to be peaceful, imaginative, and nurturing.  We encourage boys to be active, protective, and aggressive. 




Even when toy companies try to market products toward girls and boys they enforce gender stereotypes such as girls only like pink and they only imagine domestic scenarios.






  • Your response to those who believe that early childhood centers should avoid the inclusion of books depicting gay or lesbian individuals such as same-sex partnered families
First and foremost it is important, even in settings where there are no gay families, that children learn to be open and understanding when they do encounter gay or lesbian individuals or families.  And as we do not yet know the sexual orientation of young children we need to encourage a healthy development of their social identities in the present and in the future.  Just as a child who is raised in a single parent home, by adoptive parents, a foster home, step family, or by their grandparents should be made to feel like their families are accepted, so should children being raised by same sex parents feel that their experience is good and valuable. 
  • How you would respond to a parent/family member who informed you they did not want anyone who is perceived (or self-reported) homosexual or transgender to be caring for, educating, and/or interacting with their child
I still feel like I need help with this question.  It is difficult to address and value a parent/family culture that is not accepting of diverse cultures.  It is important to make every family feel as though their beliefs and values are honored, but not at the expense of the feelings of others in the program.  Once upon a time I would have explained that a person's sexual orientation is personal and does not affect the programming or care of the children in the program.  However, I know now that our personal experiences do impact our perspectives and has a role in how we perceive and act with others.  It is also important to share our personal family culture as part of the classroom sharing environment, so it cannot be completely separated. 
  • If you have ever used or heard homophobic terms such as "fag," "gay," "homo," "sissy," "tom boy," or "lesbo" as an insult by a child toward another child? Or, by an adult toward a child? Describe what occurred. How might these types of comments influence all children? (Note: if you have not had a personal experience, ask a family member, friend, or colleague)
My husband often encounters his heterosexual and homosexual high school students using these terms.  He says that in every instance he attempts to ask the students what they are really trying to say to the other student and it is usually to refer to someone being dumb.  He then tries to bring them to make the connection that the hidden message is that gays and lesbians are dumb.  As teenagers his students often just brush him off.  Whenever we use the name of people as a negative we are saying that all people in that group are bad.  One term that I hear a lot is "you _____ like a girl."  The way that this is used says that doing something like a girl is bad or inferior.  Even when a name is used as a positive such as "tom boy" it can send the message that what you are doing is unlike your gender or not "normal."
  • Any other related situations, thoughts, concerns, questions, and/or areas of discomfort you would like to share related to children, gender, and sexual orientation
When I recently listened to the NPR broadcast about how two families who were dealing with their six year old sons that identified themselves as girls it made me think about my son and anti-bias education in elementary schools (Spiegel, 2008).  Although my son does not identify himself as a girl he is not very inclined towards athletics.  He is very short and thin for his age, 11 years old.  In sixth grade the bullying has gotten severely worse.  He is harassed and excluded at school, he feels, due to his size and lack of interest in organized sports.  

When I listened to how Jonah's family has accepted their son as a girl, wearing girl clothes and playing with other girls and girl toys, I thought about how they would deal with the teasing and bullying when he goes to school (Spiegel, 2008).  This made me think about my own son and the experiences he is having.  There is a strict no bullying policy at my son's school.  I feel that this policy handles the symptoms, but does not address the reasons and feelings behind the bullying.  At my son's age he would rather put up with the bullying than tell on his classmates.  I feel that we must go beyond a no tolerance policy on bullying and address why children are intolerant in the first place.  If my son's school followed an anti-bias education the children would be led to investigate issues of injustice and those feelings behind it.  The children would be taught to see and utilize the strengths of every student and differences, such as an interest in sports or lack of, would not make a child like my son feel like less of a boy.  I am motivated to advocate for an anti-bias approach to gender issues starting in my son's school.

The following is a link to the NPR broadcast:

Spiegel, A. (2008). Two families grapple with sons' gender identity: Psychologists take radically different approaches in therapy. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/2008/05/07/90247842/two-families-grapple-with-sons-gender-preferences 

Monday, October 20, 2014

WEEK 8 COMMUNICATION AND COLLABORATION




It was great to explore the concepts of communication and collaboration with my colleagues during this course.  I am grateful for all of your insights and diverse perspectives.  I hope to see you all again in the next course.  Good Luck!

Email me at sheancody@yahoo.com
or find me on Facebook: Tricia Jackson, Grand Rapids, MI


Saturday, October 4, 2014

CONFLICT RESOLUTION


CONFLICT RESOLUTION

In a recent conflict it came to my attention that I had made someone feel judged by little comments that I had made.  They were insignificant taken one at a time, but over time it built up some resentment in this person against me.  The way in which this was presented to me attacked my sense of identity and also left me feeling confused about our relationship because my perception was that this was coming out of the blue.  The following are strategies that could help resolve this conflict:
  •   "To resolve a conflict cooperatively, a straightforward explanation of your good intentions might be in order" (O'Hair & Wiemann, 2012, p. 241).  Sharing my true intentions might make this person feel better that I am not actually judging them, but feel sorry that they are perceiving my words in that way.
  • Being respectful, reciprocal, and responsive might also help in this conflict.  First, being respectful of this person's diverse perspective helps to encourage trust and to validate their feelings (Corso, 2007).  Then if we can come to a reciprocal arrangement where both of our perceptions have a voice then we can be responsive and come to some understanding in our communications (Corso, 2007).
  • Nonviolent communication (NVC) tells us that we need to take the focus of the conflict off of being right or wrong and focus on building the relationship through giving and receiving interactions (The Center for Nonviolent Communication, n.d.).  In this situation if I avoid trying to prove that I was hurt then it takes blame out of the interaction and we can focus on what will help us build our relationship stronger. 

One of the most difficult communication skills to accomplish is expressing your feelings, wants and needs without judgement attached which is part of NVC.  I was trying so hard not to place blame on the other person in this conflict that I took on all the responsibility of the conflict.  I did such a good job of validating the other person's feelings that they felt the conflict was over.  However with my feelings not validated I felt just as hurt as I did in the beginning.  After several correspondences I felt that my feelings would never be validated and the discussion had turned to focus only on how I could change.  In the end I decided to yield.  My original feelings about taking action in this way were confirmed by Billikopft (2009) when he explains that with continual giving in to another person an "individual may stop caring and withdraw psychologically from the situation."  I feel that yielding or giving up trying to resolve the conflict will continue to make me feel disconnected from this person and prevent us from building a relationship in the future.  When you have a conflict with someone that you won't be in contact with on a regular basis is it ever good to just give up the struggle and be cordial?  We don't have to have deep relationships with every person in our life. 

References

Billikopf, G. (2009, August). Conflict management skills. Retrieved from http://cnr.berkeley.edu/ucce50/ag-labor/7labor/13.htm

The Center for Nonviolent Communication. (n.d.). The center for nonviolent communication. Retrieved from http://www.cnvc.org/

Corso, R. M. (2007). Practices for enhancing children's social-emotional development and preventing challenging behavior. Gifted Child Today, 30(3), 51–56.

O'Hair, D., & Wiemann, M. (2012). Real communication: An introduction. New York: Bedford/St. Martin's.

Saturday, September 27, 2014

COMMUNICATION EVALUATION

This week I took three self evaluations on my communication skills.  I evaluated myself based on three different areas of communication:  communication anxiety, listening skills, and verbal aggressiveness.  I also asked a friend, a past coworker, and my children to fill out these evaluations based on their opinions of me.  The results were interesting.

My scores on all three tests were very similar to my friend and coworker which all placed me mostly in the same categories except for in the area of communication anxiety.  I know for myself I scored higher in areas of small group and face to face communications and low when it comes to public speaking and presenting.  My friend's score, although in the same category, was much higher than mine.  I am guessing it is because she does not have many experiences with me in group and public situations except for casual encounters.  However, my coworker and I had a one point difference in our scores, but hers put me in a group that describes much more communication anxiety dependent on the situation.  I would say the difference stems from her experiences with me in professional group situations and my anxiety over presenting.

While I was taking the verbal aggressiveness evaluation I was reading aloud the questions and my children, in the same room and overhearing, were snickering and commenting on my responses.  I was getting the sense that they would not evaluate my skills in this area the same as myself.  Therefore, I asked them to do the evaluation.  They have little to no experience seeing me in a professional setting and children, even 15 and 11 years old, have a very egocentric way of evaluating other people.  This was the most interesting evaluation for me because I do not apply the same skills to my children that I do professionally to peers, coworkers, other adults, and other children.  Which is why in my own evaluation I think I was aware enough to answer often or rarely instead of always and never.  I must admit to using aggressive communication with my children.  I still remember when they were even younger, getting mad about a mess and purposely including the word crap to describe their belongings in order to shock them ( I had never used any swear words when speaking to them).  And it worked.  I also know that I use guilt in order to manipulate feelings of responsibility for things with my children.  I lose my temper and scream and fuss at them.  However, the fact that they feel free to call me on it and give an honest reflection of how they perceive my communication skills tells me that the good stuff outweighs the bad.  I have made my fair share of mistakes, but I always apologize and explain what a more appropriate reaction should have looked like.  My children feel loved and safe even when I am not communicating my best.  

In a recent communication conflict with an extended family member I realized that my perception of our relationship allowed me to feel comfortable enough to be myself.  I am a very sarcastic person.  My husband is sarcastic as well.  My children are now sarcastic, even the three year old.  I recognize that sarcasm has no place in the professional world and definitely is not appropriate when working with children.  However, in our house it is appreciated and valued as part of being humorous.  This extended family member did not take it to be as light hearted as it was meant and over an extended period of time it was perceived as judgment on him.  In order to have "inside jokes" or use sarcasm there must first be a strong element of trust and love that is established and unquestionable!  I have this with my kids and husband and so it is appropriate.

Reference

Rubin, R. B., Palmgreen, P., & Sypher, H. E. (Eds.) (2009). Communication research measures: A sourcebook. New York: Routledge.



Saturday, September 20, 2014

CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION

In this post I will attempt to answer the following questions:
  • Do you find yourself communicating differently with people from different groups and cultures?
  • If yes, in what ways do you communicate differently?
I think when I am communicating with people from diverse backgrounds, or just people that I feel are different than me in some way, I am way more reserved.  I hold back and prefer to quietly listen and let others take the lead.  I think that sometimes it makes me too overly cautious and it prevents me from developing relationships.  I also think that my reactions or participation in a communication depends on the role that I am playing at that particular time.  I have certain roles that have more confidence than others.  If I am in a group of people that I feel are in a higher socioeconomic class I get nervous, fidgety, and I don't make as much eye contact.  However, when I am working, teaching, or in a group of other parents I am confident in what I do and I can talk to people more easily regardless of their socioeconomic class.  Therefore, when I am communicating with people from diverse cultures it doesn't necessarily mean I will be comfortable or not, it really depends on what role I am in at the time.  I also still have a difficult time when communicating with people with disabilities or physical differences.  This is not because I feel that the people I am talking to are less than me, but I am very uncertain of what will offend them.  I am never sure if I am making enough, too little, or too much eye contact.  I spend the whole time thinking about my body language and nonverbal cues that I am unable to listen or have any kind of meaningful discussion.  We all make mistakes and I feel as long as I am attempting to get it right and develop better communication skills along with awareness of diverse groups, I will be alright and people will see the sincerity in my heart.  If they don't I will apologize and keep trying!


STRATEGIES FOR EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION WITH DIVERSE PEOPLE AND GROUPS


  • Listen effectively.  Truly listening to what people say and don't say (nonverbal cues) is essential to working with diverse cultures.  It is not always possible to prepare yourself with all the information needed to interact appropriately with different cultures, so we must rely on verbal and nonverbal cues in order to read people and their needs.
  • Think before you speak or act.  It is important to think objectively when someone behaves in a way that is unfamiliar to you.  Reacting to people before you take the time to figure out their intentions causes a lot of miscommunications and conflicts.
  • Be empathic.  Empathy can be one of your best assets when communicating with diverse cultures and groups.  If you are trying to understand another person's reality then you are much more likely to be sensitive to their cultural differences, experiences, and needs. 
  • Do the right thing.  Not only should we take steps in effectively communicating with people in diverse groups, but we should also hold others to the same standard.  It is our ethical responsibility to let people know when their words are rude or unkind and that it is unacceptable.  I believe this includes situations when there is no one visibly around that might be hurt or offended by these kind of comments.  A racist joke still perpetuates racism even when it is privately said among a group of white males.


(O'Hair & Wiemann, 2012, p. 92)


Reference
O'Hair, D., & Wiemann, M. (2012). Real communication: An introduction. New York: Bedford/St. Martin's.

Saturday, September 13, 2014

NONVERBAL AND VERBAL COMMUNICATION

For a lesson on nonverbal and verbal communication I watched a never-seen-by-me TV show, first muted and then with sound.  The following is a summary of what I learned:

Community, season 1, episode 1 WITHOUT SOUND
  • What do you think the characters' relationships are based on the ways in which they are communicating? What are they feeling and expressing based on the nonverbal behavior you are observing?
The show takes place on a college campus.  Pretty quickly they establish a main male character (man 1).  There is another male character (male 2) that introduces himself with a handshake.  The man 1 asks sees a love interest and asks man 2 about her.  Man 1 goes to see a man from human science department (man 3).  It is difficult to say if man 1 is a student or a professor.  He is wearing a button up shirt with a sweater, but also wearing track pants.  Man 1 goes to a study group and the love interest is there and it is difficult to tell whether is surprised or faking it and had planned on her being there.  He leaves quickly and has another interaction with man 3 and it is still very hard to tell the nature of their relationship.  When man 1 returns to the study group there are more people there now.  He appears to be leading the study group.  He leaves and has another interaction with man 3.  This time man 3 has a package for man 1 and it appears as though he asks for something before he gives the package to man 1.  Man 1 returns to the study group and gives them each a pep talk which makes them look happier and more confident (sitting up in there chairs, smiling, laughing).  I would guess that man 1 is a professor and he takes over the study group for man 3 in order to meet the leading lady.  However, the group looks to be a challenge and he has to decide whether to stick with them or not.  The leading lady yelling at him and his pep talk lead me to believe that he will continue with the group.


WITH SOUND
  • What assumptions did you make about the characters and plot based on the ways in which you interpreted the communication you observed?  Would your assumptions have been more correct if you had been watching a show you know well?
Well, I have realized that it is difficult to watch comedies without the sound because so much of what makes the show a success is the delivery of lines.  Comedians like Mr. Bean were brilliant at nonverbal humor, using his whole body to make you laugh.  I was right about the main character having a love interest in the girl.  However, he was not a professor, but a student that was there because he faked being a lawyer without a law degree.  The 3rd character is a professor in the social science department and was a client of the main character.  The main character wanted this man to get him access to all the answers to all the tests for the semester as a favor for getting charges of a DUI dropped.  

Much of the plot was difficult or impossible for me to decipher without verbal communication.  However, I realized that when we cannot use verbal communication we make assumptions based on visual cues and our previous knowledge.  The love plot was not hard to guess because it is a story that is used regularly in other stories.  A boy likes a girl and fakes being someone or something in order to get the girl.  Then you watch as his lie blows up in his face. 

I think knowing the plot and the relationship between the characters would have made me follow the story more, but it still would not have been funny or enjoyable.  This exercise made me think about people who are deaf or have hearing challenges.  So many times it is not what we say, but how we say things that create meaning.  In this example, if I would have read subtitles I would have known the plot, but I do not think things would have been quite so funny without out hearing the delivery of the lines.  Likewise, I think this happens when we are writing texts and emails.  So much of what we say can be misinterpreted due to how the receiver reads the message.  My spouse can text me that he is finished with an errand and coming home with the children and I can text back "great" with no punctuation.  This could be read excited great or sarcastic great.  Knowing the person that you are communicating with helps with this interpretation, but it can still be misread.  In the world of written messages that we now live in there are tools created to help with this communication.  Emoticons help let the receiver know you are happy, sad, flirting, or just joking ;)  This is to replace the understanding that we get in a face-to-face or verbal conversation.  We gain a lot of meaning from body language and voice tone and inflection.  Without carefully wording your texts and emails it is easy to cause accidental conflict. 

Reference  

Harmon, D. (Writer), & Russo, A. & Russo, J. (Director). (2009, September 17). Pilot [Television series episode]. In G. Foster, D, Harmon, P. Kienlen, R. Krasnoff, C. McKenna, & T. Shapeero (Producer), Community. City, state of origin: NBC.  Retrieved on Hulu.com

Saturday, September 6, 2014

A GOOD COMMUNICATOR

Think of someone (e.g., family member, celebrity, politician, friend, or professor) who demonstrates competent communication within a particular context. What behaviors does this person exhibit that make him or her effective? Would you want to model some of your own communication behaviors after this person? Why or why not?

When I think of good communication skills I instantly think about my best friend from college.  We can talk every day and still talk for hours.  She is one of the first people I call if I'm excited, sad, mad, frustrated, worried, stressed, or have a dilemma.  We can have very calm and civil discussions about politics even though I am far far left and vote democrat and she votes republican.  We often have different styles of parenting, but still ask each other for advice.  Here are a few of the characteristics that make her a competent and enjoyable communicator:

  • Trustworthy - I know what I say will not go beyond her.
  • Non-Judgmental - I can tell her personal feelings or reactions to things and she does not think less of me as a person
  • Respectful 
  • Does not Interrupt
  • Listens
  • She reads situational contexts really well.  This means that when I call she is able to read the situation and can tell if I need a cheerleader, a listener, a sympathizer, an adviser, a counselor, an advocate, or someone to empathize or commiserate with.  
  • She values my thoughts and opinions
  • She is not only interested in my life, but invested in it as well.  For example, she remembers when I have an important appointment and she calls to ask me how it went.
  • She asks follow-up questions

Friday, August 22, 2014

HOPES, GOALS, and THANK YOUS







HOPES 

I hope that when I work with children and families from diverse backgrounds I can provide an environment that represents their culture and cultural needs.  I want my words and my actions to express interest, respect and appreciation for who they are and encourage open dialogue and participation in the education of the children.  We are building bridges not providing one way tickets to the dominant culture.  Our differences are assets not deficiencies.



GOALS

It must be a goal of the early childhood field to include anti-bias education for teachers in training.  With diversity steadily growing in the classroom we need to equip teachers with the skills and tools to work effectively with diversity.  We need to move beyond the superficial multicultural curriculum that provides posters of people of color and an occasional book that represents ethnic and racial diversity.  

It is my personal goal to continue to look for and recognize examples of bias in education and my daily life in order to expose them and work with others for change.

THANK YOU

I would like to give a special thank you to Dr. Parrish and my colleagues for sharing their personal stories and challenges when dealing with issues of diversity, equity, and social justice.  Having an open forum to honestly discuss our bias, prejudice, and stereotypes allowed me to grow and make a move towards change.  Without the support of others this can be a lonely and fearful journey.  Thank you for your thoughtful, inspirational, and insightful posts and comments.